Evidence ratings
Amanah ratings are evidence explanations, not religious rulings. The product separates public status, menu coverage, evidence strength and practical facts so diners can make their own decision with clearer context.
A single badge cannot safely carry all the information a diner needs.
Why Amanah is showing halal information for this branch.
What the claim applies to: the whole menu, selected meats, selected dishes or unknown scope.
How strong, current and branch-specific the supporting evidence is.
These are the labels users should see. Internal signal types can be more detailed, but public language stays small and understandable.
Certification evidence is matched to the branch, with scope and freshness clear enough to show as certified.
The restaurant, menu, website or another restaurant-controlled source claims halal food is available.
Three or more qualifying reviewed community sources support the claim.
One or two qualifying reviewed sources suggest halal food may be available.
Amanah does not yet have enough reliable evidence. This is neutral, not a negative claim.
Strong reviewed evidence supports a public negative status. This is never inferred from a single weak report.
Amanah has evidence the place was halal before, but current status is no longer supported.
The score should help users understand evidence strength at a glance, while the detail page explains the sources behind it.
Current, branch-specific sources strongly support the profile.
Useful supporting evidence exists, but it may be less complete or less direct.
Amanah has a weak, narrow or older signal that needs more support.
Signals are unclear, conflicting, stale or need human moderation.
Certifier records, certificate details, expiry and whether the evidence clearly matches the exact branch.
Official menus, websites or direct restaurant statements, kept separate from independent certification.
Reviewed halal confirmations, concerns and source details. Ordinary visit reviews stay separate.
Recent evidence carries more weight. Old or undated evidence loses strength over time.
Disputed, vague or mismatched evidence reduces the score and can move a profile back to review.
Partially Halal is coverage language. It tells users what part of the food claim is supported, not who certified the restaurant.
The available evidence supports the whole menu.
Only specific meats are supported, such as chicken or lamb.
Only named dishes or a menu section are supported.
A broader partial-coverage label when more detailed scope is still being refined.
Amanah has a claim or signal, but the scope is not clear yet.
It cannot replace your own threshold, a scholar's view, a certifier's ruling or direct restaurant confirmation. It can only make Amanah's evidence trail easier to inspect.
